Well, unless there are any wildly different points someone hasn't mentioned until now, I'm going to freeze this RFC as it is (with a few minor tweaks). Various alternate syntaxes have been suggested, but I still rather like mine. Let Larry do with it what he will. Hopefully he can take something useful from the suggestion, and the ensuing discussion. Michael -- Administrator www.shoebox.net Programmer, System Administrator www.gallanttech.com --
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot sho... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot sho... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot sho... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot sho... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call a constr... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call a co... Piers Cawley
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call ... Michael Fowler
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call a constructor imp... Slaven Rezic
- Re: RFC 171 (v2) my Dog $spot should call a constructo... Michael Fowler
- Michael Fowler