David Corbin wrote: > > I've got some vague ideas on solving all of these, I'll go into if > > people like the basic concept enough. not just in regexes, but in general, a way to extend the set of bratches that Perl knows about would be very nice. for instance it is very difficult for people using european keyboards to produce curlies; if it was possible to say that Q is the opening brace and it matches against q later, or any arbitrary characters, such as the single-character versions of << and >> which I am not capable of producing, if it was possible to specify this in the code somewhere for instance $CORE::BRATCH{'Q'} = 'q'; (or maybe lexically scoped) after that one could say $isafromline = qrQ^Fromq; for instance. -- David Nicol 816.235.1187 [EMAIL PROTECTED] perl -e'@w=<>;for(;;){sleep print[rand@w]}' /usr/dict/words
- RFC 145 (alternate approach) David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Michael Maraist
- what (?x) are in use? (was RFC 14... Hugo
- Re: what (?x) are in use? (wa... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) David L. Nicol
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Eric Roode
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Richard Proctor
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) David Corbin
- Re: RFC 145 (alternate approach) Buddha Buck
- XML/HTML-specific ?< and ?... Nathan Wiger
- Re: XML/HTML-specific ?&l... David Corbin