All- As the sublist chair, I politely ask you to please table this discussion. Time is running short and this is really a digression. Glenn, if you have a proposal, please put one together in RFC format and post it to -objects. -Nate
- Re: RFC 163 (v2) Objects: Autoaccessors for object data ... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 163 (v2) Objects: Autoaccessors for object ... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 163 (v2) Objects: Autoaccessors for obj... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 163 (v2) Objects: Autoaccessors for object data ... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 163 (v2) Objects: Autoaccessors for object ... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 163 (v2) Objects: Autoaccessors for obj... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 163 (v2) Objects: Autoaccessors for... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 163 (v2) Objects: Autoaccessors... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 163 (v2) Objects: Autoacce... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 163 (v2) Objects: Auto... Glenn Linderman
- Re: RFC 163 (v2) Objects: Auto... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 163 (v2) Objects: Autoacce... Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 163 (v2) Objects: Autoacce... Damian Conway
- Re: RFC 163 (v2) Objects: Autoaccessors for object ... Dave Storrs