>Tim Conrow wrote: >> >> Tom Christiansen wrote: >> > Perhaps what you're truly looking for is a generalized tainting mechanism. >> >> Sounds cool, but I have only the vaguest idea what you (may) mean. Pointers? >> RFCs? Examples? Hints? >Sorry for the clutter, but I didn't want to come off too clueless. I know what >tainting is, I just don't know what you mean by generalized tainting. If it's >been discussed before I'd love to see a pointer to the thread. You want to have more properties that work like tainting does: a per-SV attribute that is enabled or disabled by particular sorts of expressions, sometimes dependent upon the previous presence or absence of that property, other times, not so. --tom
- RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binary data from print... Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binary data f... Michael G Schwern
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binary data f... Sam Tregar
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binary da... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binar... Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed b... Tim Conrow
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish pac... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish... Tim Conrow
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Disting... Tim Conrow
- Generalized (taint-like)... Tom Christiansen
- Generalized (taint-like)... John Porter
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binary da... Tim Conrow
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binary data f... Andy Dougherty
- Re: RFC 258 (v1) Distinguish packed binary data f... Eric Roode