At 07:37 PM 9/24/00 -0400, Ben Tilly wrote:
>We have mere days to get any final RFCs in.
>
>Is there any significant objection to my proposing two?
>
>1) Perl should switch to something like an MIT license
> together with a trademark on Perl (likely with O'Reilly
> requested to care of the details).
>
>2) Continue dual-licensing GPL/AL with the AL being as I
> rewrote it, with 1.3 and 1.4 changed to match the GPL
> wording in section 0, and whatever changes Bradley Kuhn
> comes up with included.
Gimme a day or two to come up with a clause that covers my issues with 2.8
and I'm cool with both. (I'm fine with #1 regardless)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
