On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 05:35:09PM -0400, Michael Maraist wrote: > In general, however, I don't see bytecode reading as being the real > bottle-neck. Quoting Nick Ing-Simmons in http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2000-05/msg01122.html: "I have had similar doubts for some time. CPU (parsing) speed improves faster than IO speed. The bytecode needs to be really dense for it to be a win." -- Term, holidays, term, holidays, till we leave school, and then work, work, work till we die. -- C.S. Lewis
- RFC 310 (v1) Ordered bytecode Perl6 RFC Librarian
- Re: RFC 310 (v1) Ordered bytecode Michael Maraist
- Re: RFC 310 (v1) Ordered bytecode Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 310 (v1) Ordered bytecode Tom Hughes
- Re: RFC 310 (v1) Ordered bytecode Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 310 (v1) Ordered bytecode Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 310 (v1) Ordered bytecod... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 310 (v1) Ordered byt... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 310 (v1) Ordered byt... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 310 (v1) Ordered bytecod... Tom Hughes
- Re: RFC 310 (v1) Ordered byt... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 310 (v1) Ordered bytecode Tom Hughes
- async i/o (was Re: RFC 310 (v1) ... Uri Guttman