RE: Continued RFC process

[Bryan C . Warnock]

> On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Nathan Torkington wrote:
> 
> > Closed-for-posting mailing lists that are publically readable is the
> > best suggestion we've had to meet these ends so far.
> > 
> > Anyone have better suggestions?
> 

Instead of group-writable and world-readable, how about group-writable
and world-moderated?

(Or just plain moderated, with the flavor o' the day being
autohandled...)

It's more work, which I am not a fan of, but I'm not a fan of everybody
having a say, nor a select few workers having a say. 

   -- 
Bryan C. Warnock
([EMAIL PROTECTED])