David Grove wrote: > > Ok, Visual Basic then. Really? Let's see: > If [Visual Basic] is well-suited to their needs, as they see those > needs, then [migrating to it from perl] is a good thing. Specifically > anybody whose needs could be adequately met by [Visual Basic] would > certainly be seriously dissatisfied with perl, they're as close to > opposite languages as I can think of, in many ways. Nope, not quite the same. -- John Porter
- Re: Critique available John Porter
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available Nathan Torkington
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available David Grove
- Re: Critique available Bryan C. Warnock
- Re: Critique available Bennett Todd
- Re: Critique available Tad McClellan
- Re: Critique available John Porter
- Re: Critique available David Grove
- Re: Critique available John Porter
- Re: Critique available Nathan Torkington
- Re: Critique available Bennett Todd
- Re: Critique available Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available David Grove
- Re: Critique available iain truskett
- Re: Critique available Simon Cozens
- Re: Critique available Nathan Torkington
- Re: Critique available David Grove
- Re: Critique available Nathan Torkington