At 10:11 AM 11/2/00 -0500, Mark-Jason Dominus wrote:
>My critique of the Perl 6 RFC process and following discussion is now
>available at
>
> http://www.perl.com/pub/2000/11/perl6rfc.html
The biggest issue I have with this (and had the first time around) is the
complaint about the IMPLEMENTATION section. Bluntly, I would really rather
there have been none included in the language RFCs and, for the ones that
had them, I rather liked Damian's "this space intentionally left blank" ones.
We have no infrastructure to build on. Whinging about a lack of
implementation details seems rather inappropriate.
Ideas are nice, but I expect most of the recommended implementations (if we
got them) would've been tossed out or wildly modified anyway, and it just
annoys folks to ignore things we've asked for.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
