At 07:49 AM 12/6/00 -0800, Daniel Chetlin wrote: >Simply deciding that `eval STRING' is "unimplemented" on these >theoretical ports and binary compiles is the best idea I've heard yet, >but we should remember that `require' is built on `eval STRING'. That's not necessarily the case. If we allow for pre-compiled modules (and that's one of the design goals) then require (and do) can still function with those. A palm might not be able to load in foo.pl, but it could load in foo.plc. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Perl6 on handhelds (was Re... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design Sam Tregar
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Call for apprentice: was Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- this was only an academic example (was Re: Meta... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Re: Meta-design Nathan Torkington
- Re: Meta-design Daniel Chetlin
- Re: Meta-design Dan Sugalski
- Re: Meta-design Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Supporting architectures without n... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Supporting architectures w... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Supporting architectures w... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Supporting architectures w... Adam Turoff
- Re: Supporting architectures w... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Supporting architectures w... Joshua N Pritikin
- Re: Supporting architectures w... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Supporting architectures w... Bradley M. Kuhn