Simon Cozens wrote: > > Oh boy, it's OO syntax nargery time again. *sigh*. > > I think it would be cool > > Good for you. This is internals design; perl6-language is over there ---> > and the "ph33r mY |<ewl dr3am 5inta><" phase is supposed to be over now > anyway. Cool! Thanks alot for the useful feedback. Comments like this are certainly beneficial to the goal of Perl 6. Sorry for encroaching on your god-like prowess of the subject matter. -Nate
- Re: Meta-design Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Let's not be C-specific even if we use C (w... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Let's not be C-specific even if we ... Simon Cozens
- Re: Let's not be C-specific even if we ... Adam Turoff
- OO AV/HV's and tie (was Re: Meta-design) Nathan Wiger
- Re: OO AV/HV's and tie (was Re: Meta-design) Simon Cozens
- Re: OO AV/HV's and tie (was Re: Meta-design) Dan Sugalski
- Re: OO AV/HV's and tie (was Re: Meta-design... Simon Cozens
- Re: OO AV/HV's and tie (was Re: Meta-de... Dan Sugalski
- Re: OO AV/HV's and tie (was Re: Meta-design) Nathan Wiger
- Re: OO AV/HV's and tie (was Re: Meta-design... Dan Sugalski
- Re: OO AV/HV's and tie (was Re: Meta-design) Simon Cozens
- Re: OO AV/HV's and tie (was Re: Meta-design) Dan Sugalski
- RE: Meta-design Evan Howarth
- Re: Meta-design Jarkko Hietaniemi
- RE: Meta-design Dan Sugalski
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- RE: Meta-design Sam Tregar
- RE: Meta-design Dan Sugalski
- RE: Meta-design Sam Tregar