On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Dan Sugalski wrote: > Sure, but only objects. (or, to be really paranoid, things referred to) > Nothing else needs refcounting. All the refcounting code can be isolated in > the reference creation and deletion code, and we don't have to pay it > otherwise. Good point. I hadn't considered the predominance of non-objects in Perl programs. I suppose that any system that allowed us to get away without having to refcount every simple SV would be a pretty big win even if blessed SVs still had to be counted. -sam
- RE: Meta-design Evan Howarth
- Re: Meta-design Jarkko Hietaniemi
- RE: Meta-design Dan Sugalski
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- RE: Meta-design Sam Tregar
- RE: Meta-design Dan Sugalski
- RE: Meta-design Sam Tregar
- RE: Meta-design Dan Sugalski
- RE: Meta-design Sam Tregar
- RE: Meta-design Dan Sugalski
- RE: Meta-design Sam Tregar
- RE: Meta-design Buddha Buck
- Re: Meta-design Piers Cawley
- Guaranteed object destruction ... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Guaranteed object destruct... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Guaranteed object destruct... Piers Cawley
- Re: Guaranteed object destruct... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Guaranteed object destruct... Piers Cawley
- RE: Meta-design David Mitchell
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design Jarkko Hietaniemi