Nicholas Clark wrote: > > But fflush(NULL) is, and we still seem to run > into that one on one current platform Amazingly, there are still things in supposedly ANSI-conformant implementations that are done wrong. free(0) is supposed to be a safe no-op; but on certain compilers, we get a crash. You would think, in this day and age... Btw, fwiw, I think that if C is really considered a front runner, I would throw in my lot with C++ instead. It's nearly as portable, nearly as fast, and WAY WAY BETTER to code in. -- John Porter I saw the final vicar make confession to a dancer We stood upon the bridge at dawn and the dancer kissed my cancer
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with non-C enviornm... Sam Tregar
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with non-C envi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with non-C enviornm... Hildo Biersma
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) John Porter
- documenting interfaces (was Re: Meta-design) Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Roland Giersig
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Perl6 on handhelds (was Re: Meta-design... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Perl6 on handhelds (was Re: Meta-de... Dan Sugalski