> >Or, should we just implement usleep() and (for lack of a better name) > > snooze() is a better name ;-) nap() is even better (shorter that sleep() :-) Damian
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) D... Andy Dougherty
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) D... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) D... abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? David L. Nicol
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Nathan Wiger
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? abigail
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? James Mastros
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? John Porter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Damian Conway
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? nick
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Uri Guttman
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Michael G Schwern
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? Bart Lateur
- Re: Why shouldn't sleep(0.5) DWIM? David Mitchell