Re: End-of-scope actions: Toward a hybrid approach.

[James Mastros]

On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 07:40:26PM -0700, Tony Olekshy wrote:
> The problem may be that a dynamic always statement means both
> "no matter what happens" and "not until later".  The static
> finally clause just means "no matter what happened" (the effect
> is immediate).
I'm fond of post, myself.  Simply means "subsequent to", literaly (m-w.com,
post-, 2a.  Yes, I'm anal sometimes.)  "Always" makes me say "but when", and
"later" seems like the wrong part-of-speech to me.
        -=- James Mastros
-- 
"All I really want is somebody to curl up with and pretend the world is a
safe place."
AIM: theorbtwo       homepage: http://www.rtweb.net/theorb/