At 04:01 PM 2/20/2001 -0700, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>Dan Sugalski writes:
> > I've been thinking since I sent my last mail on this that we might
> actually
> > want to leave the two (PDD & RFC) separate. Keep on with the RFCs for
> > 'external' things, and PDD for the actual internals implementation of
> things.
>
>Ultimately, I think we're going to need at least three different
>types of documentation:
>
> * internals design documents (PDDs)
> * language design documents (PLDs?)
> * change requests, once we've got something to change (PCRs)
That works. I rather like it, and I expect once we get a working perl 6, we
probably won't need to freeze things either--worst case we mark a proposed
document irrelevant or something of the sort.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
