On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 02:50:05PM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 02:27 PM 3/23/2001 -0500, Uri Guttman wrote:
> > >>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > DS> U doesn't really signal "glyph" to me, but we are sort of limited
> > DS> in what we have left. We still need a zero-width assertion for
> > DS> glyph boundary within regexes themselves.
> >
> >how about \C? it doesn't seem to be taken and would mean char boundary (not
> >exactly a glyph but close enough).
>
> That's got the unfortunate mental association with C's char for lots of
> folks, and I know I'd probably get it stuck to codepoint rather than glyph
> if I didn't use it much.
*cough* \C *is* taken.
> >also \U has a meaning in double quotish strings.
"\Uindeed."
> >
> >uri
> >
> >--
> >Uri Guttman --------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------- http://www.sysarch.com
> >SYStems ARCHitecture, Software Engineering, Perl, Internet, UNIX Consulting
> >The Perl Books Page ----------- http://www.sysarch.com/cgi-bin/perl_books
> >The Best Search Engine on the Net ---------- http://www.northernlight.com
>
>
> Dan
>
> --------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
> Dan Sugalski even samurai
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
> teddy bears get drunk
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
