Re: pitching names for the attribute for a function with no memor y or side effects

[John Porter]

Russ Allbery wrote:
> gcc and the literature both use "pure"; I'd recommend that.

Excellent! So I wasn't pulling it out of... thin air. :-)

I like pure too, but I'm afraid the nuance of it will be
completely lost on non-Functional programmers.

-- 
John Porter

Like music?  Then you're gonna love this.
I was into these dudes before anybody.
Asked me to be the manager.