On Wed May 11 00:51:48 2016, elizabeth wrote: > Doesn’t this imply that prefix ++ on native ints is broken on the JVM. > And thus, a lot of more got broken recently due to my changes??
That was my first thought, too. But this was the only place where rakudo-j got a hickup. Prefix++ works fine in different other places (and you changed some other postfix++ to prefix++ recently, IIRC). Probably this is another bug surfacing. On Wed May 11 00:59:24 2016, elizabeth wrote: > Reverted for JVM in d9b19da , but I think this warrants further > research. Thanks, Liz! I already tried to find the cause of the problem before I opened the ticket, but without success. However, we'll keep this ticket open until the problem has be resolved.
