Damian Conway wrote: > You Americans and your non-ISO penchant for putting the specific before > the general. Surely that should be: > > use Policy::O::Reilly; I knew someone would argue that, but I didn't think it would be someone as illustrious as Damian. Do you think Larry doesn't know what he's talking about? OReilly::Policy is (or might be) still general before specific. OReilly::* might be a whole family of site- specific modules. I think that's safer than supposing a universe of Policy::* policy modules. -- John Porter
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Tim Bunce
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tyin... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Damian Conway
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Larry Wall
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) John Porter
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloadi... Simon Cozens
- Re: Flexible parsing (was Tying & Overloading) Damian Conway