Larry Wall wrote: > Ordinary "next" methods don't do a goto. Well, of course, the "next" method of a syntactic loop control iterator object would not be ordinary. :-) -- John Porter
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Eric Roode
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Eric Roode
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- qX (was Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns) Uri Guttman
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns James Mastros
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Michael G Schwern
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Dan Sugalski
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Porter
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Dan Sugalski
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Peter Scott
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Dan Sugalski
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Porter
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Porter
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens