Simon Cozens writes: : On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 03:00:51PM -0400, John Porter wrote: : > Bit of a digression; but, the dynamicity of a language is in : > no way implicated by the number of methods in one build-in : > class. (Besides, this class will have at least three.) : : Ooh, at least three. Again, why special-case a class that's inextensible? It's not clear that it isn't. We're not so far off of a yield-like method on continuations here, except that yield statements typically assume the current sub as the continuation object. Perhaps Perl 6 will have ordinary blocks that can function as continuations to the surrounding list context. It's a long shot, but ya never know, ya know. Larry
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Porter
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns David L. Nicol
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Piers Cawley
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Porter
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Porter
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Larry Wall
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Porter
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Dan Sugalski
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Nathan Wiger
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Dan Sugalski
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Porter
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Dan Sugalski
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns John Porter
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns Simon Cozens
- Re: Apoc2 - <STDIN> concerns David L. Nicol