On Sat, 02 Dec 2017 05:19:45 -0800, alex.jakime...@gmail.com wrote: > Yeah. It was resolved here I think: (2014-12-08) > https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/fbc87d2a6bbfc4899b0740119ac8696cc27f1f59 > > ｢testneeded｣ > > On 2014-12-09 04:54:08, r...@hoelz.ro wrote: > > On Sun Dec 07 07:41:52 2014, masak wrote: > > > masak (>): > > > > I am not 100% sure the `&block (Dog --> Bool)` form should work, > > > > or is by spec. The `&block:(Dog --> Bool)` form comes from > > > > S06:1675. > > > > > > <TimToady> at one point we required a : because of the ambiguity > > > with > > > sublists of parameters, but we already have a whitespace dep with > > > @foo[3,3] vs @foo [$x,$y,$z], so having one for () is probably not > > > terrible > > > * masak adds TimToady's comment to the ticket > > > > This bug has largely been resolved; closure parameters now parse > > correctly and work, except when used to decide between different > > multi > > candidates.
The form with space wasn't implemented. It is now: https://github.com/rakudo/rakudo/commit/c0f99a393b Tests for both forms: https://github.com/perl6/roast/commit/a31e4655e8
