I answer myself: with % you get an Hash
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Vittore Scolari <vittore.scol...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Wouldn't here be better to use the % sigil?
>
> my %docents = bag @rows.map: -> @row {@row[0] xx @row[1]};
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Fernando Santagata <
> nando.santag...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm not sure that I've understood what you need.
>> If you get that array of arrays from a another process @rows and you wish
>> to convert it into a Bag you can do this:
>>
>> my @rows = [["JF", 1], ["JF", 2], ["MM", 2], ["MPu", 2], ["MM", 2],
>> ["FE", 2], ["FV", 2], ["MPu", 2], ["JP", 2], ["JP", 2], ["FV", 2], ["FV",
>> 2], ["JF", 2], ["MM", 2], ["MPu", 2], ["MM", 2], ["FE", 2], ["FV", 2],
>> ["MPu", 2], ["JP", 2], ["JP", 2], ["JF", 4]];
>> my Bag $docents = bag @rows.map: -> @row {@row[0] xx @row[1]};
>> dd $docents;
>>
>> # Bag $docents = ("JP"=>8,"FV"=>8,"FE"=>4,"MPu"=>8,"MM"=>8,"JF"=>9).Bag
>>
>> Otherwise you can start collecting those pairs into a Bag from the start,
>> but we would need more details then.
>>
>> HTH
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 12:10 PM, mimosinnet <mimosin...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I do not seem to be able to get this done with the Bag or BagHash type:
>>>
>>> ---
>>> dd @rows;
>>>
>>> Output: Array @rows = [["JF", 1], ["JF", 2], ["MM", 2], ["MPu", 2],
>>>> ["MM", 2], ["FE", 2], ["FV", 2], ["MPu", 2], ["JP", 2], ["JP", 2], ["FV",
>>>> 2], ["FV", 2], ["JF", 2], ["MM", 2], ["MPu", 2], ["MM", 2], ["FE", 2],
>>>> ["FV", 2], ["MPu", 2], ["JP", 2], ["JP", 2], ["JF", 4]]
>>>>
>>>
>>> my %docents;
>>> for @rows -> @row {
>>> %docents{ @row[0] } += @row[1];
>>> }
>>>
>>> dd %docents;
>>>
>>> Output: Hash %docents = {:FE(4), :FV(8), :JF(9), :JP(8), :MM(8), :MPu(8)}
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> As I understand it, this would better be achieved with the Bag or
>>> BagHash type. What would be the easy way?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> --
>>> (≧∇≦) Mimosinnet (Linux User: #463211)
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fernando Santagata
>>
>
>
