Leave off the '.kv' to get a Seq (array-like-thing) > my $letters='abc def g';
abc def g > $letters.comb().perl ("a", "b", "c", " ", "d", "e", "f", " ", "g").Seq > ($letters.comb())[0,3,4,6] (a d f) > my @letter_array = $letters.comb() [a b c d e f g] > @letter_array[1] b -y On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:02 PM ToddAndMargo via perl6-users < perl6-us...@perl.org> wrote: > On 2/6/19 12:58 PM, Patrick R. Michaud wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 12:38:01PM -0800, ToddAndMargo via perl6-users > wrote: > >> $ p6 'my Str $x="abcd"; for $x.comb.kv -> $i, $j {say "Index <$i> = > <$j> = > >> ord <" ~ ord($j) ~ ">";}' > >> > >> Index <0> = <a> = ord <97> > >> Index <1> = <b> = ord <98> > >> Index <2> = <c> = ord <99> > >> Index <3> = <d> = ord <100> > >> > >> Certainly very practical. If dealing with large strings, is > >> it the most efficient? > > > > .comb is intended to be more efficient than .split for this particular > application, yes. > > > > "comb" is about obtaining the substrings you're looking for (individual > characters in this case); "split" is about finding substrings between the > things you're looking for. > > > > Pm > > > > Thank you! >