Re: Expunge implicit @_ passing

[John Porter]

Ken Fox wrote:
> The only thing I'd like to change is to make &foo a tail call instead
> of a normal function call. But I guess that would *really* confuse
> people.

You can, with C< goto &$foo; >.
Problem is, it's *slower* (in p5 anyway) than the plain sub call.

-- 
John Porter

A word spoken in the mind will reach its own level in the objective truth.