On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Brent Dax wrote: > Okay, I forgot to account for the fact that we'd have to increment the > refcount for every inner scope a my() variable is referred to in. > That's not terribly hard, is it? I have no idea what you're talking about here. You asked if it was possible to fake lexical variables with local() (spelled temp() in Perl 6, right?). It's not. Diddling the reference count won't make it any more possible! They have different semantics that just aren't compatible. -sam
- Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Stephane Payrard
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Simon Cozens
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Sam Tregar
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Sam Tregar
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Ken Fox
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Dan Sugalski
- RE: Should MY:: be a real symbol table? Brent Dax