At 10:45 AM 9/6/2001 -0400, Ken Fox wrote: >Dave Mitchell wrote: > > So how does that all work then? What does the parrot assembler for > > > > foo($x+1, $x+2, ...., $x+65) > >The arg list will be on the stack. Parrot just allocates new PMCs and >pushes the PMC on the stack. No, it won't actually. It'll be in a list. I'll get to that in a minute in the next message. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: pads and lexicals Simon Cozens
- Re: pads and lexicals Dave Mitchell
- Re: pads and lexicals Ken Fox
- Re: pads and lexicals Dave Mitchell
- Re: pads and lexicals Simon Cozens
- Re: pads and lexicals Dave Mitchell
- Re: pads and lexicals Ken Fox
- Re: pads and lexicals Simon Cozens
- Re: pads and lexicals Dave Mitchell
- Re: pads and lexicals Ken Fox
- Re: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- Re: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- RE: pads and lexicals Garrett Goebel
- RE: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- Re: pads and lexicals Dave Mitchell
- Re: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- Re: pads and lexicals Simon Cozens
- Re: pads and lexicals Buddha Buck
- Re: pads and lexicals Ken Fox
- Re: pads and lexicals Dan Sugalski
- RE: pads and lexicals Brent Dax