I think Dan mentioned this, but it looks like the suffixes can be derived from the args being passed in. That would greatly simply the assembler to just the function names: set, eq, add, branch. Were there problems with the scheme, is someone working on it, or did it fall through the cracks? (I'm very much in favor of such a change, and will pick it up if no one else is working on it.) -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Patch to assembler/disassembler + parrot asm inconsistan... Brian Wheeler
- Re: Patch to assembler/disassembler + parrot asm in... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Patch to assembler/disassembler + parrot as... Simon Cozens
- Re: Patch to assembler/disassembler + parrot asm in... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Patch to assembler/disassembler + parrot asm in... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Patch to assembler/disassembler + parrot asm in... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Patch to assembler/disassembler + parrot asm in... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Patch to assembler/disassembler + parrot asm in... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Patch to assembler/disassembler + parrot as... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Patch to assembler/disassembler + parrot asm in... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Patch to assembler/disassembler + parrot as... Brian Wheeler