another thought...
>
> A thought (though gross): if we restrict mneumonics to not use the underscore,
> then anything after _ can be the op signature.
>
> The opcode_table could use these characters for different data types:
> integer i
> integer constant j
> numeric n
> numeric constant o
> address a
> string s
> string constant t
>
> The file could be reorganized as:
>
> set 2 i j
> set 2 i i
> set 2 n o
> set 2 s t
>
what if the table had another column (optional) at the end:
set 2 i j set_i
which gave the name of the C function which implemented it. that way the
assembly ops are independant of the C function names and multiple ops could
map to a single C routine (if needed)
I've got to know...what's the significance of the magic number? :)
Brian
