On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 12:20:29PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote: > > I suppose. I hadn't planned on inlining parrot assembly into any other > language. (The first person who suggests an asm() function *will* get > smacked... :) You'll certainly be able to use modules written purely in > parrot assembly.
1. B::Parrot 2. Parrot.xs 3. Providing opcodes for libperl functions and linking it in. I haven't suggested asm(), so technically I'm safe. Right? :) -- Rocco Caputo / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / poe.perl.org / poe.sourceforge.net
