If I might make a very small suggestion, for clarity's sake you might want to consider renaming your opcodes push_e and pop_e, or push_x and pop_x. I don't know if this violates any naming conventions you already have in place, however.
-Stephen -----Original Message----- From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 09:27 PM To: Dan Sugalski Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Exception idea Yeah, I probably should have named the register stack 'X' or something like that. At least we're thinking along somewhat compatible lines. I'll be eager to see your solution... Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 10:34 AM 10/25/2001 -0400, Jeffrey Goff wrote: > >pope # Restore the exception stack > > I've been thinking about going with an exception stack rather than a set of > exception registers, but there's something awfully compelling about an > opcode named "pope"... :) > > Dan > > --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- > Dan Sugalski even samurai > [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even > teddy bears get drunk
