At 10:12 PM 1/15/2002 +0000, Nicholas Clark wrote: >On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 03:06:45PM -0500, Melvin Smith wrote: > > Eep, you are right, as usual I answered a non-existing question, but > > this brings up a point. Various times I've seen people changing > > "signedness" of variables, etc. in one or two places to clear up a > > few warnings and I'm wondering how many times there have been ripple > > effects. > >This is a very important point - thanks for bringing it up. >It was on my mind yesterday when submitted the patch warnings in classes/, >but I should have said it more explicitly - I wasn't going to be able to >fix all the warnings within 24 hours because as soon as I started seeing >signed/unsigned warnings and "comparison with zero always" whatever then >cleaning up would involve really understanding the code.
Hey Nicholas, Just to be clear, I wasn't directing my concern at anyone, nor am I not glad for the work, heck you've probably contributed more to this project than me. It was just a general concern that I felt should be thought about. I could also be overly paranoid. Keep hacking! :) -Melvin
