While you're online: now that you've split the io ops into their
 own separate file, their documentation isn't going to core_ops.pod 
 any more. The enclosed patch fixes this by autogenerating io_ops.pod
 in the same fashion that core_ops.pod is generated, but I'm not sure
 whether this is the right thing to do - do we want every ops lib to have
 separate documentation, or should we just keep all of the documentation
 in one place, in a single file?

 Simon

--- Makefile.old        Mon Jan 21 12:34:36 2002
+++ Makefile    Mon Jan 21 12:35:05 2002
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 PERL = perl
 RM_F = rm -f
 
-all: packfile-c.pod packfile-perl.pod core_ops.pod
+all: packfile-c.pod packfile-perl.pod core_ops.pod io_ops.pod
 
 packfile-c.pod: ../packfile.c
        perldoc -u ../packfile.c > packfile-c.pod
@@ -11,6 +11,9 @@
 
 core_ops.pod: ../core.ops
        perldoc -u ../core.ops > core_ops.pod
+
+io_ops.pod: ../io.ops
+       perldoc -u ../io.ops > io_ops.pod
 
 clean:
        $(RM_F) packfile-c.pod packfile-perl.pod
 

Reply via email to