On Wed, 2002-05-08 at 12:57, Melvin Smith wrote: > > Doh! You are right, I missed that. > It should be opcode_t. Also, I'm not convinced that our INTVAL size should > differ from opcode_t. > Someone convince me.
Only if you want to do maximal native math. You don't want opcode_t to be the same size as INTVAL in that case. -- Bryan C. Warnock bwarnock@(gtemail.net|capita.com)
