On Sat, Jul 20, 2002 at 10:23:45PM -0400, Tanton Gibbs wrote: > without the recall it performs in: 16.055 seconds > with the recall it performs in: 16.722 seconds > > So, it slowed it down 6.5 tenths of a second after 10,000,000 times. That > is not too bad for ensuring correct semantics. > > What do you all think, should we pursue the function call > and accept a minor slowdown, should we attempt to automatically inline the > call, or should we abandon the RECALL idea altogether as a waste of time?
I like the idea of "correct semantics" :-) I doesn't look like we're going to gain very much in speed by inlining it, and I've not idea how much larger that would make the code. I suspect that the size increase will cancel out most of the speed gain. Nicholas Clark -- Even better than the real thing: http://nms-cgi.sourceforge.net/
