On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 03:07 PM, Damian Conway wrote:
In creating my operator list I deliberated shied away from the unary
and binary
multimorphic forms. But I do see Graham's point and would favour
retaining
polymorphic unary C<^> at least.
Meaning that the list:
+ - force to numeric context
- - force to numeric context, negate
+^ - force to numeric context, complement
~ - force to string context
~^ - force to string context, complement
simply becomes:
^ - complement (type-specific)
+ - force to numeric context
- - force to numeric context, negate
~ - force to string context
Correct?
MikeL