Luke Palmer writes: > > What _are_ you talking about. IIRC, there were never any plans for > such a "placeholder." There were the placeholder _variables_, $^x et > al., but the underscore was never used for such a thing. That could > be why I've been so confused by some of your examples. >
i am sorry , you are right , somehow i had an impressionthat _ + _ is a valid syntax , butthis is different language aracdi
