On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 09:49:42AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 5:45 PM -0800 12/16/02, Dave Storrs wrote: > >Just so I'm clear, are you saying that you think L2R is a bad idea, > >and should not be supported? Or just that it has not yet been > >demonstrated that this is a good idea? > > I think it's a good idea, and that it should *not* be supported.
Um...I'm sorry, I really don't understand that, could you explain it to me? If it's a good idea, why shouldn't we support it? --Dks
