On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Leopold Toetsch wrote: > Andy Dougherty (via RT) wrote: > > > In this case, I suspect it's failing to match "pIt", which was recently > > added to interpeter.c:setup_default_compreg(). > > Nothing to suspect here ;-) > In "[CVS ci] eval #1" I wrote: > > Missing and left for an exercise for Joe Other Parrothacker: > build_nativecall.pl lacks to handle an 'I' signature type, the > interpreter should be pushed on the stack. Also the signature "pIt" is > missing. So eval runs only on jit/i386 now.
Ah, I see. That's reasonable. Certainly you've done lots and lots; we can't expect you to do everything. > I think we can stand 3 failing tests for one or two days, when the > reason is well known. Well, it's more like there are perhaps 3 passing tests; everything else fails :-). That's one reason I didn't find your earlier message describing this problem. It wasn't obvious to me that this massive failure of nearly everything was due to "eval", so I didn't think to look for messages in that thread. What I was actually hoping was that after suggesting a fix to cpu_dep.c yesterday to get it to at least compile, I could check the tinderbox today and see if my suggested fix worked. I can see my fix got cpu_dep.c to compile, but I don't know if it would also have passed any tests. Oh, well. I'm sorry I don't have much time to dig in myself and fix things. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]