I'm not sure if I'm asking a stupid question here, but: On Fri, May 30, 2003 at 08:12:34AM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> We add three ops, findmeth, callmeth and callmethcc. (The latter just > automatically takes a continuation for the following op and stashes > it in P2, while the former assumes one has been put in P2 already) You say P2 is a continuation > They all find a method PMC based on the object and method name > already loaded. The call ops then call > that PMC's invoke vtable entry, which acts as normal. > > So the sequence is: > > P0 = P2->find_method(interpreter, P2); But you seem to be using P2 like it's the object I'm confused. Surely there are 3 things to play with - object, method name and continuation to "return" to? If so, are they P0, P1 and P2 before these ops? Nicholas Clark
