On Tue 28 Oct 2003 17:51, Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Storable looks like it's performing pretty well, with only a small > > overhead. Eventually, I think that a transition to a real database > > (where you can read/write only the portions of interest) would be good. > > How would you define "portions of interest"? > > Certainly some changes are needed in the higher level processing. > But there's possibly no need for a "real database" (if you mean > DBI/SQL etc which carry significant overheads). Multiple files, for > example, may suffice. > > Tim [who would really like to find the time...]
Google gave Results 1 - 50 of about 278,000,000. Search took 0.26 seconds. on "time" :) finding is not the trouble. Asigning it to what we want to do with it is causing the trouble. Bosses always take the biggest part. -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/) using perl-5.6.1, 5.8.0, & 5.9.x, and 806 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, 11i, AIX 4.3, SuSE 8.2, and Win2k. http://www.cmve.net/~merijn/ http://archives.develooper.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] send smoke reports to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], QA: http://qa.perl.org
