> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael G Schwern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:03 PM > To: Potozniak, Andrew > Cc: 'chromatic'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: thinking about variable context for like() > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 12:23:19PM -0500, Potozniak, Andrew wrote: > > Is anyone going to develop this, or is all of this just > > wishfull/theorhetical thinking? > > Boy, that sounds like a volunteer if I ever heard one! > > Anyhow, it looks like Test::LongString is what you want. Now > say thank you to Rafael. :)
Uh.....thank you Rafael! Anyway I was just giving my two cents on a possible implementation to see what the "general" perl-qa community thought about it. > > > > If someone will develop this are we going to add it to Test::More > > What's this "we" stuff, bub? :) > > No new functions are going into Test::More. The interface is > pretty much > done. This is ok because... > > > > or create a module wrapped around Test::More with the added > > functionality? > > ...you don't write wrappers around Test::More. You use the > same underlying class Test::More does: Test::Builder. This > includes, oddly enough, like()! > > > -- > Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ > Do not try comedy at home! > Milk & Cheese are advanced experts! Attempts at comedy can > be dangerously unfunny! >