Hi, Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2004 23:39 schrieb Leopold Toetsch: > Chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Me too. There's supposed to be a magic initialization sub of some kind > > called on library load. I'm inclined to stick it in there, but it's not > > there yet. > > I'll have a look at that _init call tomorrow - albeit _init (it was that > name IIRC) could be a too commonly used label. _library_init or such > could be better. That sounds reasonable. _library_unload might also be practical.
> > One downside of making sdl.imc smarter (changing it from sdl.pasm) is > > that we can no longer use build_tools/build_nativecall.pl as is. That > > may be an argument for making the tool smarter. > > Why? Sorry if its a stupid question, but what has build_tools/build_nativecall.pl todo with sdl.pasm? I have to admin that I only have touched the NCI stuff cursorily. Has anyone tested parrot/sdl on Windows? As far as I kown, SDL needs some DirectX init calls on Windows, which is normally done in SDL's own main function; SDL_main.h contains some information about that. > > -- c > > leo jens
