Woolley Kj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not a biggie, but here is a quick patch for ops.num that should stop > the warnings about ops 1426 to 1432 not being mentioned there.
It's not really decided, if these opcodes are 'official'. So I'd rather wait a bit before nailing down ops.num. > Cheers, > ~kj Thanks, leo > PS: What's the recommended diff format for Parrot patches? This one's > a unified diff, but I can send context diffs in the future. Unified is the prefered format.
