Tim has decided now anyway ....
On May 11, 2004, at 6:16 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
It's sufficient. And no, don't remove it and don't change to "use warnings:";
Tim.
So I will make sure all the tests have the -w in the she-bang line.
Steve
On Tue, 2004-05-11 at 15:19, stevan little wrote:
If 5.6.1 is the official minimum, then maybe this brings back up the -w vs. warnings issue? Since Ovid pointed out that 5.6 was the minimum for the warnings pragma, and 5.6.1 is your "official" minimum, it seems maybe the choice is back on the table.
What's the point of changing it? If you're not using lexical warnings in the test, it does the same thing.
Change for change's sake is often counterproductive to your goal.
-- c
