At 10:49 PM +0300 4/28/04, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> Yech, good point. I'm not even sure you can do any sort of sane
abstraction there.
In that case, are we better off chopping it out entirely and leaving
it to library code, or making it a simple yes/no indicator that there
are some? (Chopping it out's probably the best thing)
Chopping off sounds like less coding :-)
I think the same general KISS approach applies here that you chose with
the time handling - no need to implement calendar algorithms in Parrot
lowest layer, so I don't think trying to abstract Universal ACL schema
is a priority. If someone after Parrot 1.0 wants to implement Tibetan
lunar calendar or POSIX 1.e ACLs in IMC, let them. The operative word
being "them".
Mmmm, point. OK, death to ACLs!
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
