> -----Original Message----- > From: Damian Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 18 May, 2004 08:09 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: idiom for filling a counting hash > > > Austin Hastings wrote: > > > Hmm. For junctions I was thinking: > > > > ++ all([EMAIL PROTECTED]); > > > > Which is almost readable. > > But unfortunately not correct. Junctions are value, not lvalues.
That'll have to be fixed. I suppose if you tried to mix l- and r-values it'd cause a new class of error (assuming the junction collapsed that way) but why not bundle lvalues together? =Austin
