Jonadab the Unsightly One writes: > Austin Hastings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I think this is something that we'll want as a "mode", a la > > case-insensitivity. Think of it as "mark insensitivity." > > Makes sense to me, but... > > > Maybe it can just roll into :i? > > It will probably get used in _conjunction_ with case-insensitivity > quite a lot, but I suspect people will want to be able to use one > without the other. > > Since mark-insensitivity is probably mostly a non-issue in the ASCII > world, it would probably be a better candidate than average for being > turned on using a unicode character, if we're running low on letters > for designating these rules.
Or, god forbid, a word? m:base/que mas/ We're not mathematicians: we're allowed to use more than one letter in a row to designate something :-) Luke