On 8/20/04 5:30 PM, Austin Hastings wrote: > How about "scalar"? The fact that one person, one time, came up with a > need to invoke it doesn't mean we have to race it up the huffman tree. > P6 is winning the DWIM race most of the time contextually. Maybe [#] as > a macro, if you like.
Yeah, that's my feeling too. I was going to suggest "sc", but I don't think having to writ out "scalar" is too much of a hardship. I think the drive for a single-char version is driven more by symmetry than expected usage frequency. (I also think S is ugly and _ looks like a typo in many situations) -John
